It has come to our attention that various attorneys and bankruptcy trustees have visited, or otherwise became knowledgeable of this web site. It is reported that when questioned about organized crime operating in the U.S. Bankruptcy courts , some attorneys have asked if the questioning party has heard of Wells of Justice. The answer makes no difference. These attorneys say that "it's all a bunch of lies."

This web site references and quotes from documents of public case record. Some documents are provided by links. Therefore, we agree that some of those allegations and statements documented and filed by bankruptcy trustees, and decisions entered by some bankruptcy judges are all "a bunch of lies."

For example, when Chapter 7 trustee Thomas Lester stated in his Final Report filed in case number 97-50687 that he sold property listed on the debtor's schedule, it was a lie. The property sold by bankruptcy trustee Thomas Lester is not listed on the debtor's schedules.

When Chapter 7 trustee Stephen G. Balsley alleged in case number 98-53581 that the debtors had not turned over any money and an accounting as ordered by the court, he lied. The cancelled check endorsed by Stephen G. Balsley is a matter of the public case record. The accounting was acknowledged in various hearings by trustee Balsley, although he justified his lie by criticizing the accounting. There's a huge difference in saying he didn't receive any accounting, as opposed to receiving an accounting he didn't like. Can you imagine suing a restaurant for not serving you just because you didn't like the meal?

When Chapter 7 trustee Bernard Natale introduced a charge of fraudulent conveyance in case number 99-53279, it was a lie. Bernard Natale withdrew as trustee from the case, giving way for trustee Thomas Lester to file a charge of fraudulent conveyance against the non-debtor ex-spouse of the debtor that Natale admits to counselling as a client. Chapter 7 trustee Thomas Lester requested bankruptcy Judge Manuel Barbosa to void an order entered by the Circuit Court. That was a lie. Judge Barbosa does not have jurisdiction to void an order entered by another court. The case was deceptively manipulated to force the debtor and non-debtor into entering a settlement for $5,000 "for the benefit of creditors." That was a lie. Chapter 7 trustee Thomas Lester diverted the $5,000 plus interest of $115.82 to his compensation.

A particular attorney that stated to a party that information on this site is a "bunch of lies," is correct. This site presents quotes from case documents that he prepared, demonstrating that his documents are "a bunch of lies." For example, in case number 98-53595, on April 29, 1999, the attorney filed a response to the trustee's motion stating:

It appears that the attorney was giving the impression of justly defending his clients. That is a lie. Incorporated in the bankruptcy trustee's Final Report is an itemized billing. The itemized billing documents that on September 13, 1999, the bankruptcy trustee and attorney for the debtors had a conversation regarding the trial where the attorney agreed "not to contest." We are so convinced that this is all a bunch of lies, that we have posted the page from the itemized billing in the case "Confusing Issues" posted under " Cases."

Then there is the Kyle case in California, where the trustee Carolyn A. Dye objected to the debtor's statutory homestead exemption on the basis that the debtor did not own the property. After having the bankruptcy court enter order objecting to the debtor's homestead exemption, the trustee then sold the same property as property of the debtor's bankruptcy estate.

There are other examples we can provide, but we prefer that our readers examine the record for themselves. Under the section "Cases" are a "bunch of lies," made and documented by bankruptcy trustees, attorneys and bankruptcy judges to abuse the law, betray trust, extort, and embezzle, for their financial enrichment.